They sensationalise every f**king thing. God forbid they wrote an article praising emergency services or the military. There is a story on www.news.com.au this morning about a South American man who “allegedly” stole a packet of biscuits, got tasered three times by police – and then died. You can read the story here.
But as always, I ask my standard question: What was this guy doing, that saw police need to taser him? The answer in this case is that he resisted arrest, then ran from police. They tasered him, but he recovered and was able to fight off up to five policemen before running away again. So, he was tasered again.
I see this as completely legitimate reasons for tasering. Police are empowered with catching criminals and seeing that charges are laid. And that’s exactly what they’ve tried to do in this case. If we were in any number of other countries, the guy would have been shot. But because of all our civil libertarians, the cops have to use tasers. And when they do – they get interogated by beaurocrats.
There’s a line in the article that asks why the man wasn’t just crash-tackled or over-powered. If Mark Morri (the author) read his own work, he’d see that the cops TRIED that. But despite being tasered already, the crim was able to fight these guys off.
And there was a story on the same website a few days ago where police tasered another guy – who subsequently died. There was a call from civil liberties groups to put a suspension on tasering. But you know what? It’s because of these groups that we have tasers in the first place! THEY are the ones that wanted a “less than lethal” alternative. But it seems that if someone with a bad heart dies from a taser – that’s the police’s fault.
It’s all well and good for the public, or these groups, or politicians to sit back after the fact and analyse every second of the incident and seek explanations as to why police followed the course of action that they did. But when you’re THERE, and shit is going down – you don’t have that luxury.
If a guy is able to fight off FIVE cops, he deserves every f**king thing he gets. If a crim continues to resist, the cops need to put them down. I don’t mean that in the euthanasia way, but in the sense that they need to bring the struggling to an end. Thanks to the civil liberties groups, they can’t just draw their weapon and shoot – they have to use a taser. And if the crim is uneffected by the taser, then the cop needs to decide AGAIN – do we taser or shoot?
In my opinion, regardless of who you are, where you’re from or what your background is: if a cop draws a gun or taser and tells you to stop – YOU STOP. And if you don’t – then face the consequences of your actions, champ. I have no problem with cops tasering anyone until they comply. If death comes as a result of bad choices by the criminal, then so be it.
Really, that means one less person we taxpayers have to pay to keep in jail. I am behind the police 100% on this. I think these guys (and gals!) do an amazing job in a world that is going mad. We want the police to do a better job, but the government cuts their funding, gives them bullshit payrises, continues to impose tougher and tougher restrictions, and then complains when things go wrong.
It’s the same in the military – our budgets get cut, our training gets cut, our powers get taken away. But the government expects us to do a better job than before – and then hangs us out to dry when things go bad.
I think the media should be singing the praises of these guys and girls. It wouldn’t have been hard to write that article, stating that police had to defend themselves to bring the guy down, or to state that they were being overpowered and potentially had their lives in danger. But no, it has to be negative about the police, doesn’t it.
Arseholes.
